vancomycin resistant enterococcus faecalis vre strains (ATCC)
Structured Review

Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus Faecalis Vre Strains, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 914 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/vancomycin resistant enterococcus faecalis vre strains/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 914 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Compounds Containing 2,3‐Bis(phenylamino) Quinoxaline Exhibit Activity Against Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Enterococcus faecalis , and Their Biofilms"
Article Title: Compounds Containing 2,3‐Bis(phenylamino) Quinoxaline Exhibit Activity Against Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Enterococcus faecalis , and Their Biofilms
Journal: MicrobiologyOpen
doi: 10.1002/mbo3.70011
Figure Legend Snippet: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs, mg/L) against drug‐resistant S. aureus and E. faecalis strains.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs, mg/l) of two selected compounds and four comparative agents against a panel of S. aureus (Panel A), E. faecalis (Panel B) and E. faecium (Panel C). Panel A ‐ All clinical strains of S. aureus (blue line), except for the final three standard S. aureus strains (ATCC 29213, ATCC 700698 and ATCC 700699, black line). MSSA = methicillin‐sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ; S = sensitive; GISA = glycopeptide‐intermediate S. aureus ; hGISA = hetero‐GISA; Panel B ‐ All clinical strains of E. faecalis (blue line), except for the final three ATCC/NTC strains (black line). VRE = vancomycin‐resistant enterococci; S = sensitive short for MSSA ‐ methicillin‐sensitive S. aureus ; Panel C ‐ VRE = vancomycin‐resistant enterococci; S = sensitive. Comparative agents: Van – Vancomycin; Lzd – Linezolid; Teic ‐ Teicoplanin; Dap – Daptomycin. A colour code was used based on the highest (in blue) to the lowest MIC value (in green) of the data set (the coloured bar, mg/l, is included on the left‐hand side of the picture). The highest range of the colour mapping was set to 2.00 (Panel A) or 4.00 (Panels B and C) for visualisation purposes.
Techniques Used: Glycoproteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: Pre‐exposure of S. aureus and E. faecalis to quinoxaline analogues decreases their sensitivities.
Techniques Used: Analogues
Figure Legend Snippet: Pre‐exposure of S. aureus and E. faecalis to compounds 25 and 31 and impact on cross resistance to clinically available antibiotics.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: MBC values of compounds 25 and 31 against S. aureus and E. faecalis .
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Quinoxaline analogues induce phenotypic alterations to the surface of both S. aureus and E. faecalis . Scanning electron micrographs of S. aureus ATCC 29213 (A–F) and E. faecalis NCTC 12201 (G–L). Panels A and G and Panels B and H represent untreated cells captured at 20,000‐ and 50,000‐times magnification, respectively. Bacteria treated with 2x MBC concentration of compound 25 are depicted in Panels C and I as well as Panels D and J at 20,000‐ and 50,000‐times magnification, respectively. Bacteria treated with 2 x MBC concentration of compound 31 are shown in Panels E and K as well as Panels F and L at 20,000‐ and 50,000‐times magnification, respectively. Blue arrows: loss of cellular content; red arrows: wrinkled cell surfaces; black arrow: cells that appear to have collapsed.
Techniques Used: Analogues, Bacteria, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Quinoxaline analogues showed better anti‐biofilm activities (MBEC) compared to five selected comparative antibiotics.
Techniques Used: Analogues
